PER is a flawed statistic. Brook Lopez is 4th, Tim Duncan is 5th, Tony Parker is 7th. The best way to tell who's the best is to just watch them play. I'm not saying that Lebron isn't the best player in the league right now, because he is. I am saying however that he is not as good as his stats make him appear to be.PER is an efficiency rating, and Lopez Duncan and I think Parker dont play a lot of minutes, and all 3 are playing great.
That's because Lebron is only a leader in the top five in only one of the six major catagories and only a top ten in two. He's not dominating anything here - Not even in double doublesBut who has better overall numbers? Who is as high as he is in the five categories he is (points, rebounds, assists, steals, TS%)??
But who has better overall numbers? Who is as high as he is in the five categories he is (points, rebounds, assists, steals, TS%)??.
Tell me who historically has done more statistically and then I can see what you mean, because all you are saying is 'he doesnt lead everything,' which is impossible
You didn't address the point. You just listed names again. Find their total contributions in those five categories and show that they we're higher in the league at the time, in addition to PER.
Dude - he's not even in the top 40 in some of them and barely the top 10 in one or two of them. As far as historically better
Magic Johnson,
Kareem Adbul Jabaar
Kobe Bryant
Shaq Oneal
Larry Bird
Many others
I would have to study a bit more on the per to see how the various groups came up with the rating to determine if the rating is a valid one. To be honest - I have never really considered it a valid rating any more then I do the fg% - because I haven't seen championships won in direct relation to the total, but obviously there is a lovefest for Lebrons genitals by all of you guys. I would point out that Kevin Durant is only seven-tenths of a percent lower then Lebron's per - so that would disqualify Lebron as a once in a generation type placer using your own standards. A once in a generation would be defined as the only one to accomplish that in your lifetime - and Lebron isn't the only one even by your standards. I acknowledge Kobe isn't a high per - because he has a history of taking to many shots and not distributing the ball enough even though Kobe sits at the 6th sport in that position.
PER is a flawed statistic. Brook Lopez is 4th, Tim Duncan is 5th, Tony Parker is 7th. The best way to tell who's the best is to just watch them play. I'm not saying that Lebron isn't the best player in the league right now, because he is. I am saying however that he is not as good as his stats make him appear to be.
I would point out that Kevin Durant is only seven-tenths of a percent lower then Lebron's per
Yes, Laker fans, this (TLF) is your main representative on these boards. If he were a Philly fan, I'd start bashing him because all it does is make a fanbase look bad. Especially when he creates more threads than anyone on here
Look above your post! Now would you define him as the best