HOUSE BILL NO. 545

  Get rid of the real dumb **** (nuke the fridge, rope swinging like a monkey),

The nuke fridge Id leave in, just cuz the Indy movies all had a few of those roll your eye moments.  Maybe not as over the top as being at the first nuke blast, but some campy, ridiculous situations.  Its what makes em Indiana Jones. 

The rope swinging was infact dumber than dogshit****. 

Plus like someone else said....ok so, The arc/holy grail which nobody has ever seen.  Certainly not in the past 2000 years is more believable than the crystal skulls which actually exsist.  you can go see them this weekend if you want. 

Sooooo..... is it just religious folks that hate it?  Indy "purists"?  I dont know, I just thought it was indiana jones made in 2008. 

What does crack me up are the people that scoff at the alien theme, but yet had no problems with Biblical Arks, magic stones and Holy Grails lol.

Despite the fact that those crystal skulls Really exist.  

Supposedly the ark is in a small church in some nigra country and only a couple of priests are allowed in to look at it.

What I like most about the Indy series is it is based of real things.  Not neccessarily that the Ark was a real thing, but the legend shown in the movie (city of Tanis, etc) was the leading theory at the time the movie was made as to what happened to the Ark.  Pretty cool.  Since disproven, but whatevs.

I can't remember a roll your eye moment in any of the other three anywhere near as bad as the fridge seen. 

near as bad as the fridge seen.



Like I said not nearly as over the top.  But getting chased by giant bolder thru a tunnel... hopping minecarts over broken rails after seeing a guy remove a still beating heart by magic???   Look away and the evil spirits wont melt your face off?      

I can't say for sure, but I think I remember watching a cocumentary on Raiders that said the boulder thing was based off a real incident.  At the very least, it said traps and shit**** like that were come across from time to time.  And the spirit things is based on religious ideas.  It was the power of god they were witnessing.  Man is not meant to see that.  Therefore anyone who did not humble themselves and not look was killed.  Anyway, that is 100% fictional, a nuke and a fridge are 100% real.

So...what you are saying is, SOME  democrats are coming for your guns, doesnt mean ALL democrats are?

No, some democrats are coming for some of your guns.  Let me know when there is a law like this proposed that includes all guns, not just assault weapons. 

There's no question there are some extreme democrats just like there are some extreme rebublicans.  But there is about .0003% chance of a law passing that bans all guns and requires citizens to turn in any ones they have.  So, if you want to argue against something that has extremely little support and almost no chance at all of passing, go right ahead.  Just don't pretend it's anything more than that.

Uh mball.  Keep up, we've moved beyonf that and are on Indiana Jones.  jesus.

utkipp1 wrote:

Uh mball.  Keep up, we've moved beyonf that and are on Indiana Jones.  jesus.

Give him a break.  He's probably knee-deep in poop and lack of sleep right now, if not addicted to soap operas and reality TV.

 if not addicted to soap operas and reality TV.

You say that like he wasn't before becoming Mr. Mom

not just assault weapons. 

Glad to see you hunny.

I guess I should have been more clear, but this is actually what shocked me.  Its not just AR-15s.  If you look at what the labled as assult weapons, its semi-auto pistols, Semi auto shotguns, semi-auto rifles.   It was a wiiiiiiiiiide brush of stuff they wanted banned.  By those definitions... about half my guns would be illegal.   

The Missouri and Washington liberal democrats know that these bills will not secure enough vote, YET. What their hoping though is that the constant visual attempt to ban guns will catch on. They are throwing out the fishing net and hoping to catch 1 fish at a time to bring aboard.  Soon they will have enough to challenge the status quo.

It's liberal thinking.  

"Liberal thinking?"  Lol.  What you described above has been done by both sides, for as long as our govt has been split into two sides.

Soon they will have enough to challenge the status quo.

What's "soon" in your book?

Glad to see you hunny.

---

***cool guy, or what?***

You'd think a stumpy oaf with 4 incher like Twisty would keep his pie hole shut, but, he's far too stupid.

Only kidding, Twisty You're not far too stupid.

<br />

<blockquote class="QuoteMessage">***cool guy, or what?***</blockquote>

Im not sure if this is supposed to be an insult or not.<br /><br /><br /><br />

<blockquote class="QuoteMessage">with 4 incher like Twisty </blockquote>

Pretty generous of you.  <br />

Pretty generous of you. 

---

I can afford to be generous. I even pay property taxes so the common people in my district can get a free, public education, which most are too stupid to benefit from.

I even pay property taxes so the common people in my district can get a free, public education, which most are too stupid to benefit from.

A Liberals idea of charity. 

which most are too stupid to benefit from.

A genius's view on grammar.

from which most are too stupid to benefit.

Thank you, Winston.

Is this thread about anything?

Twisted's myopic view of life?