Official Stop OBAMA Express!!!

looks as though you will have to accept me as I am....

wrong again azzclown...that's your problem...its YOU that needs to start accepting others not like YOU...you'll get it one day...the election was only 4 days ago, and you're already back to your old ways, huh...

...and fyi...oriental is not the right word there....its 2012 dude, you can do better...

looks as though you will have to accept me as I am....

wrong again azzclown...that's your problem...its YOU that needs to start accepting others not like YOU...you'll get it one day...the election was only 4 days ago, and you're already back to your old ways, huh...

...and fyi...oriental is not the right word there....its 2012 dude, you can do better...

lol...I was messing with you dipchit...


I must accept others and their behaviors and the consequences that typically follows that behavior...right?

I was messing with you dipchit

OMG!   That's the first time   I have ever seen you call anyone a name


Maybe now you'll quit crying like a little girl about how other posters call names

And to save you the trouble, saying you cry like a little girl is a comparisan, not name-calling

SEC...when fact meets your fiction.


According to a study by professors at Smith College, George Mason University and the University of Toronto (they surveyed 1,643 full-time faculty at 183 four-year schools), 72 percent of professors at American universities labeled themselves liberal, while just 15 percent said they are conservative. 50 percent of faculty members identified themselves as Democrats and only 11 percent Republicans.

Political Science professors Robert Lichter of George Mason University, Neil Nevitte of the University of Toronto and Stanley Rothman of Smith College also found that 51 percent of those surveyed said they rarely or never attend church or synagogue. University, Neil Nevitte of the University of Toronto and Stanley Rothman of Smith College also found that 51 percent of those surveyed said they rarely or never attend church or synagogue.

These liberal leanings translate into liberal political beliefs. 84 percent of those surveyed are strongly or somewhat in favor of abortion rights, 67 percent think homosexuality is acceptable, 88 percent want more environmental protection "even if it raises prices or costs jobs" and 65 percent want the government to ensure full employment, which puts the professors to the left of the Democratic Party.

The study, appearing in the March issue of the online political journal the Forum, was funded by the Randolph Foundation, which donates to mostly conservative organizations.

Jonathan Knight, director of academic freedom and tenure for the American Association of University Professors, was asked about the study. He told The Washington Post, "The question is how this translates into what happens within the academic community on such issues as curriculum, admission of students, evaluation of students, evaluation of faculty for salary and promotion."

Knight added he is not aware of "any good evidence" linking the personal views of professors to what they teach. He must be living in an ivory tower without Internet access, or he believes surveys such as this one are "bad evidence" because they don't conform to his views.

A quick Google search of "liberalism on college campuses" brings a wealth of good evidence that what is being taught on many of them is anti-American, anti-religious, anti-Israel, pro-gay rights and pro-abortion, often to the exclusion and ridicule of opposing views.

In December, Columbia University appointed a committee to look into charges of bias and intimidation by faculty, particularly in Middle East studies. Columbia isn't the only university with bias problems when it comes to the Middle East. Checkout [www.campus-watch.org] for many more examples.

Ward Churchill, a tenured professor at the University of Colorado, is in the news for his grotesque characterization of the 9/11 victims as "little Eichmanns" who were not casualties of terrorism, but legitimate "military targets." His views are part of his teaching.

From "gay rights" courses, even majors, at an increasing number of colleges, to the usual anti-military and anti-free enterprise bilge that has been documented in numerous books and articles, only those who are in complete denial would claim there is no link between the mostly liberal views of professors and how they shape their subject matter in the classroom, at numerous forums and in campus advocacy groups that constitute modern academic life.

Thomas Reeves of the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute has said "conservatives are discriminated against routinely and deliberately" in faculty hiring, making some highly qualified teachers virtually unemployable because of their political and social views. This guarantees a perpetuation of a one-dimensional approach to most subjects.

In matters of race and gender, colleges practice affirmative action to employ more minority and female professors and attract more students with these characteristics. Why won't they do the same for conservative professors and students in the name of diversity, pluralism and academic freedom?

Why do so many conservative parents send their children to these colleges and often subsidize their tuition when so many undermine their beliefs and values? Stories are legion of young people who are sent to these schools and emerge with a far different worldview from when they entered.

Fortunately, there are many alternatives to these "reeducation camps" and parents would be well-advised to search for them if they don't want their kids to grow up to be liberals

72 percent of university professors labled themselves liberal

Kind of re-enforces the fact that the more educated you are the more likely you are to be liberal

Are you really going to tell me that a person's political leanings will influence the way they teach chemistry, physics, mathematics astronomy etc?

I owe my liberalism to my 4th grade spelling teacher

72 percent of university professors labled themselves liberal

Kind of re-enforces the fact that the more educated you are the more likely you are to be liberal

Are you really going to tell me that a person's political leanings will influence the way they teach chemistry, physics, mathematics astronomy etc?

I owe my liberalism to my 4th grade spelling teacher

LOL...based on your posts...I'd say 4th grade is as far as you got. It's ok Jethro...no one will hold it against you. 

I'd say 4th grade is as far as you got.

In other words even your tiny little brain can't refute that liberal 4th grade teachers dont brainwash their students

It's ok Jethro

Toyota:  Uncle Jed!  Uncle Jed!   I just gradgiated 6th grade!!!!

Uncle Jed:  Wheeeeeee   doggggiees  Only 12 more years of school!

I'd say 4th grade is as far as you got.

In other words even your tiny little brain can't refute that liberal 4th grade teachers dont brainwash their students

It's ok Jethro

Toyota:  Uncle Jed!  Uncle Jed!   I just gradgiated 6th grade!!!

Uncle Jed:  Wheeeeeee   doggggiees  Only 12 more years of school!

No, as I said before...its not math, physics and you can include spelling...its other subjects...you can do it in Social Studies and now English in the fourth grade...but, you knew this already because nothing gets by you.

Just think what you could have accomplished had you finished school? Are you bummed looking back now? haha

As I said before..it's not math

Dont remember that

and now English in the 4th grade

LMAO   Spelling used to be part of the language curriculum ,but I guess it isn't anymore

So this brainwashing starts at as early as the 4th grade?

Are you positive it doesn't start in kindergarten?

Are you positive it doesn't start in kindergarten?

Sec, bible brainwashing starts earlier than that.

As I said before..it's not math

Dont remember that

and now English in the 4th grade

LMAO   Spelling used to be part of the language curriculum ,but I guess it isn't anymore

So this brainwashing starts at as early as the 4th grade?

Are you positive it doesn't start in kindergarten?
___________________

When you were in school did they still teach the earth was flat?

Been a while and it shows...old fart! 

Kind of re-enforces the fact that the more educated you are the more likely you are to be liberal

in many circles the belief is that many become professors / teachers because their fear of failure or failures in the real world...but, you knew this already didn't you?

Liberal teachings wouldn't be a problem in universities if they only taught math, chemistry, physics...however, liberal arts, creative writing and other non-essential classes required for degrees is where it rears its ugly head.

in many circles the belief is that many become professors / teachers because their fear of failure or failures in the real world...but, you knew this already didn't you?

sux, you do know that is in your circles.  Many of us believe teaching is an important profession and should be paid accordingly.

in many circles the belief is that many become professors / teachers because their fear of failure or failures in the real world...but, you knew this already didn't you?

sux, you do know that is in your circles.  Many of us believe teaching is an important profession and should be paid accordingly.

Where did I say they are not important or shouldn't be paid accordingly?

72 percent of university professors labled themselves liberal

Kind of re-enforces the fact that the more educated you are the more likely you are to be liberal

Those who can, do; those who can't, teach...

DD...you have cornered the varmit. My guess, he will run and hide and never answer you..

So it appears.


And where's bb and proof of me/anyone lying?  


If Obama/his team were as witless as you guys, Romney would have won this past Tuesday with about 95% of the vote.  

So it appears.


And where's bb and proof of me/anyone lying?  


If Obama/his team were as witless as you guys, Romney would have won this past Tuesday with about 95% of the vote.  

lol...DD...have you been labeled by any of these nutbags a racist yet? That is where you know you have 'em by the short hairs.

When all else fails its a typical misfit response. I have no answer so you must be a racist.

BTW, thanks for posting. I enjoy the responses you are receiving. Classic!

Have you ben labeled by any one of these nutbags a racist yet?

So we're going a long when Mr I am not a racist/racebaiter who never thinks in terms of race,  brings the subject up

Wonder why

Howevever, unlike you have done a billion times,  DD has said nothing that sounds racist

I don't recall him even talking about race

you on the other hand..........

Have you ben labeled by any one of these nutbags a racist yet?

So we're going a long when Mr I am not a racist/racebaiter who never thinks in terms of race,  brings the subject up

Wonder why

Howevever, unlike you have done a billion times,  DD has said nothing that sounds racist

I don't recall him even talking about race

you on the other hand..........

Funny chit sec and another fail on your part...

Its only a matter of time...when he has you stumped ( which he does ) you, in typical fashion fire something outlandish at your opponent...why would this instance be any differnet.

Mr. Famous had you stumped numerous times and you hurled the race accusations at him constantly...


Me? Well, of course I am racist! You said it...it must be true! It all started when I endorsed Herman Cain and from there it moved to endorsing Condi Rice as possible VP pick?

I hate even driving on blacktop for christ sakes...

Mr Famous had you stumped numerous times

Yeah  He had me stumped so well he invented the he's on my ignore list bs   Of course he screwed up and revealed he was lying and plenty of people saw it

you hurled the race accusations at him constantly

He is a racist    why should I not acknowledge that    He's very proud o it

Well, of course I am a racist

Ad that is one of your better qualities, eh mammy boy?

Mr Famous had you stumped numerous times

Yeah  He had me stumped so well he invented the he's on my ignore list bs   Of course he screwed up and revealed he was lying and plenty of people saw it

Actually IMO...he owned you! ( owned ) oops there I go again.
_________________

you hurled the race accusations at him constantly

He is a racist    why should I not acknowledge that    He's very proud o it

Funny, I never read anything that would put him in that category...Must be just you Mr. Sensitive

________________

Well, of course I am a racist

Ad that is one of your better qualities, eh mammy boy?

Ah yes...the word "Boy"? lol...where it all started...your menory is as sharp as a watermelon? oops...there I go again...hahaha 

It is what you want it to be...

Newsmax is reporting that the Patreus affair info was held until after the election so it couldn't damage the Obama re-election? According to them the investigation started last spring with emails...

A FBI source has been used for the story.

So, if true? thoughts? Impact?

Is this also what we will find out about Bengahazi?

What else is out there?

[http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-
11-10/foodstamps-surge-most-one-yea
r-new-all-time-record-delayed-relea
se]

Yep...more out there?

Newsmax is reporting that the Patreus affair info was held until after the election so it couldn't damage the Obama re-election? According to them the investigation started last spring with emails...

Newsmax is about as "fair and balanced" as Breitbart. Both are right-wing echo chambers. Everyone knows Petraeus investigation started months ago.  No one cares about it.

This is why Republicans are bent out of shape, most people don't care about the issues that Republicans are trying to raise.

This is why Republicans are bent out of shape, most people don't care about the issues that Republicans are trying to raise. 

Most conservatives don't care about Patreus.

But for the sake of the country, I hope you're wrong about this where Benghazzi is concerned. 

Newsmax is about as "fair and balanced" as Breitbart. Both are right-wing echo chambers. Everyone knows Petraeus investigation started months ago.  No one cares about it.

This is why Republicans are bent out of shape, most people don't care about the issues that Republicans are trying to raise.

Yeah...and I remember the "National Enquirer" was a rag that eventually broke a story of a dem presidential candidate having an affair? So, it has to be CBS, ABC, NBC or CNN to be credible? lol

One should ask...who authorized surveilence of Patreus? And who looked at emails ( said to be in the thousands )? Were low level FBI staffers allowed to view classified info? And if they knew of affair in the spring...why wasn't he forced to resign ASAP. Would blackmail of our most secret of agencies be at risk?

I really don't think this is a deal to be brushed off lightly. And I was a huge General Patreus supporter. 

Yeah...and I remember the "National Enquirer" was a rag that eventually broke a story of a dem presidential candidate having an affair? So, it has to be CBS, ABC, NBC or CNN to be credible? lol
===================
that is one hell of a good  point.

One should ask...who authorized surveilence of Patreus? And who looked at emails ( said to be in the thousands )? Were low level FBI staffers allowed to view classified info? And if they knew of affair in the spring...why wasn't he forced to resign ASAP. Would blackmail of our most secret of agencies be at risk?
================================
those wielding this info , i believe, held this trump card until it would do the most good in protecting the Admin. With the Benghazi hearings right around the corner.... Bam , instant fall guy, ntm an instant overshadowing of the hearings with lurid details of the affair trickling out of the news cycle over the next few days.

I really don't think this is a deal to be brushed off lightly. And I was a huge General Patreus supporter. 
==================
agreed on the first sentence. 

TOYOTA/SUX wrote:

Newsmax is reporting that the Patreus affair info was held until after the election so it couldn't damage the Obama re-election? According to them the investigation started last spring with emails...

Sounds likely, but so what ?  No one cares about Petraeus, who was a Bush-era construct, held over to be a figurehead for Obama.  I'm a little surprised the story broke at all, and that Petraeus didn't just resign.  Perhaps he refused, or called the bluff of whoever in the FBI had the goods on him.  It's not like it was a brief, or light affair...

A FBI source has been used for the story.

Well, they have the best information and most motivation to pursue the investigation.  After all, this woman represents a massive breach of security.  Petraeus could've been brought up on charges, and was only given the luxury of retirement as a courtesy, recognizing his years of service to the country.  Not that some in Congress don't want hearings or anything...

So, if true? thoughts? Impact?

It is true.  It just proves that even someone respected by both parties can be lacking in character.  Obama will need a new director of the CIA, to go along with his new head of the treasury and secretary of state.

Is this also what we will find out about Bengahazi?

No.  And the CIA did its job with regard to Libya.  It handed its information off to the State Department, who chose to ignore or minimize the possible effects of armed gangs of terrorists affiliated to al Qaida running around a largely unsecured country.  SecState believed at the time that a mission in Benghazi was more important than the concerns about a budget that didn't even provide for a grossly inadequate measure of base security.  Sometimes the cards you're dealt don't add up to a winning hand, but you have to play them anyway.

The scandal with Benghazi was that government at the highest level chose to try to cover it up and lie to the American people.  Generally, it's the sort of thing that helps evict someone from office, but Obama & co. knew that only about 4-8% of the country thought foreign policy was among the most pressing issues in regards to the election.

What else is out there?

Iran.

Taiwan.

Greece.

If Obama/his team were as witless as you guys, Romney would have won this past Tuesday with about 95% of the vote.

dd, when are you guys going to get over the last election and stop complaining about what it means?

Time to work on solutions.  Do you have any?

If Obama/his team were as witless as you guys, Romney would have won this past Tuesday with about 95% of the vote.

dd, when are you guys going to get over the last election and stop complaining about what it means?

Time to work on solutions.  Do you have any?

BB...this is where we do have agreement.

I have stated prior that I say the GOP should give the dems all they need right now...not later.

Either we will accelerate growth using the dems ideas or we accelerate its failure. To piss around another four years on this back and forth crap is only going to hurt the country...short term and long term.

Funny, Red questioned my sincerity? Is he afraid I could be right? Hell bells?