Broncos reportedly interested in Derrelle Revis

Views:      
 
-

Broncos reportedly interested in Derrelle Revis?

January 26, 2013 3:47 pm
Walker, I don't assume anything. I know the cap situation the Jets are facing. You can argue generalities and call my argument simplistic but you're wrong again. The Jets are in trouble. Turn on a radio, open a newspaper, search google. Don't just pretend to know something and think you can get one by me. I'd expect, after losing argument after argument against me you'd smarten up and do a little homework. And before you call BS let's recap our last long back-and-forths. According to you...1) Firing Cameron was a mistake. Last i checked the Ravens are playing in the SB. 2) 40% is higher than 95%. Self explanatory to anyone over 5 years old. 3) The Redskins and Cowboys will sue the NFL. No such luck. That's off the top of my head. Feel free to search for a time you were right.
e-love0
SinceAug 18, 2006
-

Broncos reportedly interested in Derrelle Revis?

January 26, 2013 3:54 pm
Oh, forgot another gem. You argued with me a couple of seasons ago when I said that Mark Sanchez sucked and was a turnover machine. That was classic. And when it comes to that and your made up generalities about the Jets cap situation, aren't you from the area? Do you even pay attention to what's going on around you? Jeez.
e-love0
SinceAug 18, 2006
-

Broncos reportedly interested in Derrelle Revis?

January 26, 2013 6:09 pm
There is more insight to this possible trade fromnm the posters on this board then I have read online or heard on TV or radio.

For example, this NFL.com article is what any average fan has said about moving Champ to safety since Namhdi was available.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap10
00000130940/article/darrelle-revis-
which-teams-will-go-after-jets-cb?campaign=Facebook_atl_rosenthal

[Denver Broncos]: John Elway is in win-now mode because of[Peyton Manning]'s age and doesn't seem afraid to make a bold mood. With promising youngster [Chris Harris] in place, the[Broncos] would have a nice-looking secondary. [Champ Bailey]could potentially move to free safety.

It's all speculation at this point but there are lots of factors to consider. Salary Cap, resign key players to contracts, Free Agency, etc.

Would I like the Broncos to sign Revis?  Of course.  Just not sure we can afford it and don't think it is the biggest priority.

 
Morpheus*SFH^E*
SinceJan 23, 2007
-

Broncos reportedly interested in Derrelle Revis?

January 26, 2013 6:19 pm
My favorite part of the article.

The next three names were mentioned by Mike Freeman as teams that are "highly interested" so they make a great starting point for the following irresponsible speculation and dot connecting: 
Morpheus*SFH^E*
SinceJan 23, 2007
-

Broncos reportedly interested in Derrelle Revis?

January 26, 2013 6:51 pm
I agree Morph. I'd love to have him too but signing our key FAs is priority #1. After that, with the cap room left, we have to sign whoever we end up drafting. Sure it could be chump change if we were to deal away a 1st and possibly 2nd or 3rd but it leaves us with little room. Can it be done? I think so but we'd also have to lock up a lot of money in extending Revis and what about any other FAs we may be looking at? I think it's a HUGE gamble unless we were able to restructure a few contracts including Dooms. Who knows. On the surface it looks dicey.
e-love0
SinceAug 18, 2006
-

Broncos reportedly interested in Derrelle Revis?

January 26, 2013 8:18 pm
Honestly, the only free agents that I'm at all for signing are Bannan and Vickerson (with one year deals, two at the most)..  With a priority on; Clady, Unrein, Carter, and Colquitt.  IMO we should have enough to fill any other need through the draft or our own developmental players.  In order to keep a responsible cap number we need to keep on building through the draft and resigning our own star players. 


Another point I would like to make is the possible dead money that will be on the books for the next few years..  From my understanding the dead money also follows with trades too.  So if for instance, Kuper was traded we would have dead money in terms of his contract for the next few years. 

Andre Caldwell 1 million
 
C.J. Davis 555,000

Mario Fannin 483,000 

Caleb Hanie 1.25 million

Joe Mays 4.167 million, 4.6 million

Julius Thomas 651,000, 741,000  

Manny Ramirez 715,000

Chris Kuper 5,915,000, 6,415,000, 6,915,000

D.J. Williams 7,732,500     

Plus the 4.1 million in dead money already.
 
This is unless they can restructure some of these contracts.
   
          
kylpama3
SinceAug 13, 2009
-

Broncos reportedly interested in Derrelle Revis?

January 27, 2013 12:10 am
It's only dead $ if they cut them or trade them. If the Broncos don't do either to any of the above the dead money issue is irrelevant. The real issue is cap savings vs dead $. If the corridor is big enough then the dead $ issue is a non issue. I haven't researched each player you listed but only DJ, Kuper and Mays look like possible problems based on the amounts you provided. Keep in mind that the bulk of dead money the Broncos carried leaves the books after the Super Bowl. The only dead $ I see for 2013 is Goodman, Paxton, Coffey, Miller and Remers.
e-love0
SinceAug 18, 2006