If you only look at the play-by-play of the last out recorded by Andrew Bailey and the Boston Red Sox Wednesday night against the Oakland Athletics, you'll see this:
Jed Lowrie :Ball, Foul, Foul, Ball, Foul, Ball, Lowrie struck out swinging.
If you saw the game, however, you saw the A's possibly get screwed out of a Lowrie double with in a one-run game. And just as we've done so many times in the past few seasons, we're left wondering why baseball can't review such plays.
MLB.com has a video of the play, albeit with a difficult camera angle.
“I saw him call it, but I kept running because I couldn't believe it,'' Lowrie said (ContraCostaTimes.com). “It's easy to say in retrospect, but I have been in favor of more replay. That wouldn't change the way I feel about this one. It's about getting the call right.''
Many on the scene said they saw chalk kick up when the ball hit the ground, including A's manager Bob Melvin.
“I saw the chalk fly,'' Melvin said (ContraCostaTimes.com). “that call makes a huge difference. Now we've got a man in scoring position with one of our hottest hitters [Josh Donaldson] up. I wish we had more replays for boundary (fair/foul) calls.''
Here's the screen-grab shown on MLB Network, via loyal reader Jeremy:
Remember, if any part of the ball touches any part of the foul line, that's a fair ball.
We're not talking about robots calling balls and strikes or having an extended delay after every single out or safe call. We're talking in this case about a boundary call. It's fair or foul. Or fan interference.
The umpires are human beings and they are invariably going to mistakes on calls with a small little sphere flying down a line at a high speed. Not only that, but this particular crew was down a man, as Home plate umpire Jerry Layne left the game after being hit on the left hand by a foul tip in the third inning. Second base umpire Mike Estabrook took over behind the plate and they continued with a three-man crew.
Why not get better camera angles -- how about one going down each line with the ability to slow things down frame by frame? -- and use modern technology? And even if the technology doesn't give us definitive evidence, as will happen at times, at least the play was given a second look.
Maybe Lowrie's ball was foul. Maybe it was fair and the A's still would have lost. It's all possible. I just don't understand why we can't find a better way of doing things when it's so close.