• My Scores
  • NFL
  • MLB
  • Golf

Leaderboarding: Bonds, Clemens and the best non-Hall of Famers

By Dayn Perry | Baseball Writer

Any discussion of best non-Hall of Famers starts with Barry Bonds (left) and Roger Clemens. (USATSI)
Any discussion of best non-Hall of Famers starts with Barry Bonds (left) and Roger Clemens. (USATSI)

MORE: The Hall of Fame case for Barry Bonds | The Hall of Fame case for Roger Clemens

While on the topic of the 2014 BBWAA Hall of Fame vote, let's take a brief detour and have a look at the best players who are or have been eligible for induction but aren't in the Hall of Fame. More specifically, which post-1900 players who have appeared on the BBWAA ballot at least once in the past but did not earn the necessary 75 percent have the highest career WAR?

To clarify, active players like Alex Rodriguez and Albert Pujols aren't eligible for inclusion on the list to come. The same goes for retired players appearing on the ballot for the first time in 2013-14 (e.g., Greg Maddux and Frank Thomas) or in the years to come (e.g., Randy Johnson and Chipper Jones). Just those players who have appeared in the ballot at least once before and didn't make it are being considered.

Preemptive strike: No, WAR -- or Wins Above Replacement -- is not the final word in player valuation, but it demonstrably is a useful way to gauge the general worth of a player with one single statistic. So we're using it for these purposes.

Obviously, Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens figure to feature prominently, but what other players make it? Are they one and all those of a recent vintage who have been kept out because of PED suspicions? Let's find out ...

Highest career WAR by eligible non-Hall of Famers
PlayerCareer WAR (with all-time rank)Highest BBWAA vote %
Barry Bonds162.5 (4th)36.2%
Roger Clemens140.3 (8th)37.6%
Curt Schilling79.9 (62nd)38.8%
Jeff Bagwell79.5 (63rd)59.6%
Lou Whitaker74.8 (77th)2.9%
Larry Walker72.6 (85th)22.9%
Rafael Palmeiro71.8 (87th)12.6%
Bobby Grich71.0 (90th)2.6%
Alan Trammell70.4 (94th)36.8%
Rick Reuschel70.0 (98th)0.4%

There's Bonds and Clemens -- two of the best ever -- and there's Bagwell, who's been unfairly lumped in with known PED users. Then there's Palmeiro, of course, and that's the extent of the "steroid era" casualties. As for Schilling and Walker, their omissions have more to do with faulty perceptions of their value rather than PED suspicions.

Every player on the list is, per WAR, one of the 100 greatest of all-time, as you can see. As for the voting percentages, Bagwell's is the only one that portends future election (he's on the ballot this year for just the fourth time, so 11 more to go), barring unforeseen changes to the electorate. Since players fall off the ballot once they fall below 5.0 percent, it's hard to overstate the extent to which Whitaker got screwed by the voters. The same goes for Grich, albeit to a lesser extent.

For those wondering, Pete Rose (career WAR of 79.4), who'd be a first-ballot selection absent that gambling scandal and absent his not being eligible, would slot in just behind Bagwell on the list above.

CBSSports Facebook Google Plus
Conversation powered by Livefyre

mlb Video

August 27, 2015
Justin Verlander's performance (1:09)
August 27, 2015
Will the Mets fall apart?
August 27, 2015
Is Girardi making the right calls?
August 27, 2015
MVP candidates


Most Popular

CBSSports.com Shop

Men's Nike Scarlet Ohio State Buckeyes No. 15 Limited Football Jersey

College Sideline Gear
Get your favorite school
Shop Now