PHOTO: The 'Cardinals' Way' vs. the 'Dodgers' Pay'
Is the NLCS a story of good (largely homegrown) against evil (built by buying other teams' talent)? To hear one paper tell it, yes.
The 2013 Cardinals were largely forged through amateur signing and development. This year's Dodgers model, in contrast, was primarily built around free agent acquisitions and through salary-absorbing trades (note: the words "largely" and "primarily" are not absolute). In a vacuum, it scarcely matters -- winning is the point, and the champagne cares not how you earned the right to spray it. In terms of broader appeal outside the two fan bases in question, though, there's no doubt that the methodical construction of the Cardinals is more appealing than the "throw money at the problem" approach of the Dodgers (note: throwing money at a problem sometimes works quite well).
In any event, the hometown St. Louis Post-Dispatch certainly drew such distinctions with their art for an NLCS insert in Friday's edition. Regard:
Please do use the comments section to argue over which team is morally superior!
Our Latest Stories
Starting next season, Rob Manfred will have even more power along these lines
The disappointing (and expensive) outfielder failed to run out a ground ball on Thursday
Chris Archer asked, and the Tigers' ace answered
The University of Minnesota will play a weekend series in U.S. Bank Stadium
In 12 years with the club, Buehrle won 161 games and was a four-time All-Star
A report indicates Cubs brass found Sosa's recent comments 'bizarre'