On Thursday, MLB and the Major League Baseball Players Association announced seven rule changes that will go into effect for the 2017 season. Hereâs one of those changes ...
An addition to Rule 5.07 formalizes an umpire interpretation by stipulating that a pitcher may not take a second step toward home plate with either foot or otherwise reset his pivot foot in his delivery of the pitch. If there is at least one runner on base, then such an action will be called as a balk under Rule 6.02(a). If the bases are unoccupied, then it will be considered an illegal pitch under Rule 6.02(b).
While this might strike you as an unnecessary clarification, itâs pretty much in response to the unorthodox delivery of reliever Carter Capps, now of the Padres. Have a look-see ...
Now letâs home in a bit ...
Capps, as you can see above, incorporates a hop of sorts in order to, one assumes, incorporate some leg drive and move his release point closer to the plate, which increases perceived velocity. Insofar as the new rule is concerned, itâs not just about balk considerations, as made clear above. Even without baserunners, the pitcher is not allowed to take a âsecond step.â Circling back to Mr. Capps ...
Andy Green: Padres will continue to correspond w/MLB re:Carter Capps' delivery. Their current understanding is the hop-drag remains legal.
— Dennis Lin (@sdutdennislin) March 2, 2017
Hop-drag!
Speaking of which, hereâs how Cappsâ somewhat reconstructed delivery looked as of last month ...
Because the only way to truly appreciate Carter Capps' delivery is in slow motion ð³ #PadresSTpic.twitter.com/uLZHfWlThr
— San Diego Padres (@Padres) February 15, 2017
All right. Sure, one might call that a hop-drag, but one might also call that two hops instead of the old one hop. Is this an improvement insofar as the rules are concerned? I donât know that Iâd call it an improvement insofar as the rules are concerned.
The Padresâ understanding of things is that Cappsâ delivery is legal so long as his foot âdragsâ -- i.e., maintains contact with the ground. That doesnât appear to be happening in either the old delivery or the new hop-drag delivery. The new clarification, however, says that the pitcher may not take a second step. If weâre going to parse it in Cappsâ favor, then maybe that initial micro-hop doesnât quite constitute a first step, and as long as his toe drags the mound as he advances toward the plate, heâs in the clear. Something like that.
In any event, Thursdayâs ruling was designed to provide some clarity when it comes to Cappsâ delivery. Iâm not sure it did that, even a little. Hop-drag, indeed.