Jose Bautista will finish the season with a major-league best 43 homers.
(Getty Images)
Updated Sept. 28
It seems anticlimactic to lead this final Best o' the Best edition of the Player Rankings with award picks, as we've been debating them nonstop for the last month. Or maybe it's more accurate to say that we've been debating the precise definition of "valuable." Award-winning investimagative journamalist that I am, I decided to take a closer look.
I started my inquest by employing the world's laziest rhetorical tactic: clicking over to the Merriam-Webster online dictionary. It alternately defines "valuable" as "having monetary value," "of great use or service" and "having desirable or esteemed characteristics or qualities." While that last one provides some small amount of clarity -- off the list you go, A.J. Burnett! -- it doesn't say anything about teammate caliber, placement in the standings, weight of September performance or impact of big home runs off surgical reclamation cases really, really late on the Sunday night before the season ends. Darn.
So for my picks, I decided to conflate "valuable" with "bestest" and "of the year" with "of the year and/or season." Thus for Most Valuable/Bestest Player, I've got Jose Bautista and Matt Kemp. For Cy Young, I've got Justin Verlander and Roy Halladay. For Rookie of the Year, I've got Jeremy Hellickson and Freddie Freeman.
Bautista led the universe in OBP and SLG and played solid defense at two positions. It's not his fault that he doesn't share lineup real estate with Dustin Pedroia. When he places fourth in the MVP voting, he should be all "value THIS" and grab his unmentionables. That'd learn 'em!
Not only did Kemp get the most out of his talent, but he started respecting his elders and treating the media with 32.5 percent less disdain than he did in 2010. There's nothing voters love more than a redemption song, especially if it's warbled by somebody who remembers their name.
The question is how to distinguish Braun's case from Prince Fielder's. Same team, same on-base-iness, same cement-handed defense, etc. Braun slugged more and ran the bases better, but ultimately it will come down to "he has a higher batting average." This makes me sad.
Some folks point to Sunday's game-winning dinger as the moment that won him the MVP trophy. Others point to Monday's drop of what became an inside-the-park homer as the moment that lost it. Me, I'm focusing on the 2 for 6 in a 16-4 drubbing of Toronto on June 11.
He gets overlooked because he always plays like this. Shame on us all for our inability to see the tree among the forest, or something. Entirely unrelated: if the Tigers get to the World Series, they have to play him some at third base, right?
He has the counting stats but also the grandest supporting cast, plus he reacts to line drives as if he's on a seven-second time delay. A defensive do-si-do with Brett Gardner would be in everybody's best interest.
Give him credit: In his free-agent year, he answered all the questions: Can he hit for power? Check. Can he serve as a wellspring of clubhouse mirth and bonhomie? Check. Can he reduce his torso jiggling to a Jell-O-like sway? Check.
Despite similar stats, last year's MVP golden boy is this year's afterthought. As far as dismissive arguments go, "he had his turn last year" is even dumber than "he only ranked 11th in the league in runs scored."
If it weren't for that Bautista guy, lazy voters would be able to fill out a defensible 10-man AL MVP ballot consisting strictly of Boston, NY and Detroit players (say, Ellsbury, Gonzo, Pedroia, Ortiz, Granderson, Cano, Sabathia, Cabrera, Verlander, Avila). Lousy Bautista.
He added a 100-RBI season and all sorts of platitudes about "accountability" to his resume, neither of which renders him any more of a ballplayer than he already was. He remains No. 1 on the list of guys-to-build-a-team-around.
Can't you picture some self-appointed keeper of the flame pondering his MVP ballot and thinking, "Not so fast, Mr. Upton. Your time will come"? This image would be more chucklesome if voters didn't routinely penalize players for youth or perceived arrogance. Democracy doesn't work.
The difference between his 2011 season and his other ones is basically a middling six-week stretch at the start of the season. Go ahead -- try and make a case that a guy like Michael Young had more value this season. I dare you.
But I don't get the MVP argument, voter-bait win total or no. The Tigers won their wretched division by 37 games; it's not like Verlander pushed them over the top. His achievement in the fields of no-hitterism and bullpen preservation will be justly acknowledged with the Cy trophy.
He mocks your fancy metronomes and atomic clocks; their irregularity both appalls and amuses him. As for his Cy case, for me it comes down to the complete games and Eckstein-small walk and HR rates. You can't go wrong with any of the NL big three.
If you're making a Kershaw argument, ditch the "pitching triple crown" nonsense (Ws/ERA/Ks) for "I like him and want to vote for somebody other than Halladay this year." At least you'll sound genuine that way.
Your imminent playoff meme: Who's the better big-game pitcher, Lee or Halladay? Me, I look to the physiological intangibles. Lee has wee beady eyes and a midgame heart rate of 25 beats per minute, but Halladay has stealthily menacing facial hair and an underrated gameday scowl. Tough call.
If you're Wilson's agent, and you know how much money he made you with a season like this on the cusp of free agency, how do you thank him? At the very least, I'd super-size the Harry & David gift basket.
Here's how good Hamels was in 2011: Phillies fans no longer care that his daily self-maintenance routine makes liberal use of both moisturizer and a comb.
Given the lack of reliable rotation depth behind him, one could argue that he's more "valuable" to the Yankees, under at least four of the definitions we're using this week, than Justin Verlander is to the Tigers. Discuss.
Forget the complete games -- it's not often that we see a righty pitcher pick off as many baserunners as Shields did this season. Don't let his dull-as-a-superhero-alias name fool you; he's got a little ninja in him.
I'm demoting him due to aesthetic concerns: There was an inning in the next-to-last Yankee/Red Sox series where he threw 17 pitches in 12 minutes. That's not an exaggeration. It was like watching paint dry on turtle hair.
The numbers are impressive, but he accumulated them largely against the Giants, Dodgers and Padres. That doesn't make him a lesser competitive being -- you can only play the teams on the schedule -- but it renders moot the Cy arguments. Did he outpitch, say, Ricky Romero?