Forgot Log-in ID / Password? | Help Not a member, Register Now!

  New Jersey Nets logo

Register to Customize or Login

New Jersey Nets
Location: East Rutherford, N.J. | Arena: IZOD Center (19,990) | Principal Owner: Bruce Ratner | GM: Kiki Vandeweghe
Head Coach: Kiki Vandeweghe (I) | Titles: 0
Team PageScheduleStatsRosterDepth ChartTransactionsTeam ReportPhotosHistoryListen to 660 The FanMessage Board
 

N.Y. can seize property for Nets arena, court says

ALBANY, N.Y. -- New York's top court ruled Tuesday that the state can use eminent domain to force homeowners and businesses to sell their properties for a massive development in Brooklyn that includes a new arena for the New Jersey Nets.

 

In a 6-1 ruling Tuesday, the Court of Appeals said the Empire State Development Corp.'s finding that the area was blighted was enough to justify taking the land.

A group of tenants and owners claim the seizure is unconstitutional. They argue that developer Bruce Ratner's proposed $4.9 billion, 22-acre Atlantic Yards project mainly enriches private interests, while the state constitution requires public use for taking land.

"The constitution accords government broad power to take and clear substandard and insanitary areas for redevelopment," Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman wrote for the majority. "In so doing, it commensurately deprives the judiciary of grounds to interfere with the exercise."

Ratner's proposed development includes office towers, apartments and a new arena for the NBA's Nets. A key element in his plan is selling majority team ownership to Russian entrepreneur Mikhail Prokhorov.

In a prepared statement, Ratner said construction will continue, with the intent that the Nets will play ball there in the 2011-12 season.

"Once again the courts have made it clear that this project represents a significant public benefit for the people of Brooklyn and the entire city," Ratner said. "Our commitment to the entire project is as strong today as when we started six years ago."

The attorney for homeowners and tenants who declined to sell after the project was announced in 2003 said the fight isn't over. Matthew Brinckerhoff said his clients will oppose the ESDC when the urban development agency goes to court in Brooklyn in the second step of the process to take the properties.

"They have won Round 1, and we still have Round 2 to go," Brinckerhoff said. "I think everybody believes that they need to do a number of things by the end of the year, and where exactly this fits into that process I'm not sure. But the fact that they haven't yet taken the properties can't be helping them."

Warner Johnston, Empire State Development vice president, said the agency is committed to seeing the project completed.

"We can now move forward with development which will accomplish its goals of eliminating blight, and bringing transportation improvements, an arena, open space, affordable housing and thousands of jobs," he said Tuesday.

Lippman noted that the law empowering the government in the 1930s to partner with private entities to deal with the emerging problem of slums was intended also to create replacement low-cost housing. This plan instead is aimed at "alleviating relatively mild conditions of urban blight," mainly a railyard, and there were only 146 people living within the project boundaries when the final environmental study was done, he wrote.

In a dissent, Judge Robert Smith said the court majority was "much too deferential to the self-serving determination by the ESDC that petitioners live in a 'blighted' area, and are accordingly subject to having their homes seized and turned over to a private developer."

The record does not support the state agency's finding, Smith said. While the blight is documented at northern end of the project site, the southern part "appears ... to be a normal and pleasant residential community," he said.

Copyright 2010 by STATS LLC and The Associated Press. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of STATS LLC and The Associated Press is strictly prohibited.
 
 

Nets Headlines
Talk Back
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 22, 2006

November 25, 2009 4:43 pm
From a lot of comments here it seems that some people here have no sympathy for the people who will lose their homes. Some have said that these stupid and greedy people should be happy and thankful that the Nets are building a great stadium to lure the "great" LeBron ...(more)
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:May 25, 2007

November 24, 2009 10:06 pm
If they can be part of an domain suit and profit from it and the courts say it is all good heres an idea. With the Nets at 0-13 and counting, why should Nets fans not be able to sue the Nets for malpractice in the operation of their franchise? I know its a reach, but the rest of this discussion bores the hell out of me. I would like to hear ...(more)
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 18, 2006

November 25, 2009 12:57 pm
Using eminent domian to FORCE people to sell their houses and leave their businesses to build a stadium? What the hell is that bull? This is some left-sided bologna. Sports are a part of a lot of people's lives, but it is not their whole life. There is no way in hell someone should be able to do this but money talks in this country. They will probably pay for this in the stimulus ...(more)
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 18, 2006

November 24, 2009 12:33 pm
"The law perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it! The law, I say, not only turned from its proper purpose but made to follow an entirely contrary purpose! The law become the weapon of every kind of greed! Instead of checking crime, the law itself guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish!"

-Fredric Bastiat

Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Aug 24, 2006

November 24, 2009 1:21 pm
Why is it that we give them so much power? They blackmail cities to fund the building of new stadiums. Then they go and charge ridiculous prices to get into the places that we the tax payers paid to build. All so the rich can get richer. Now we allow them to remove people from their homes and force business men to sell away their livelihood so we can pay even more to build the rich some more stadi ...(more)
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 31, 2008

November 24, 2009 1:52 pm
While Obama is screwing over the rest of the big corporate businesses in the country, it is good that the high courts in New York are reasonable enough to give Ratner the other 6% of the property holding up the construction. This project will be great for New York, bringing in a massive amount of jobs & revenue to help construct this massive project. It should be an amazing addition to the col ...(more)
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Jul 6, 2007

November 24, 2009 5:25 pm
LeBron going to the Nets is ten...twenty times more important than their petty selfishness. 

Grow up people, it's just property.  You can always buy a new house, you can only get a chance at a transcendant player like once a lifetime.
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 14, 2006

November 24, 2009 2:55 pm
are liberal opportunists looking for a big payout....yet they will bitch and whine and drag this on to try to drive up the price and use the media...just get paid and move on....that neighborhood has changed over at least 5 times isnce the 1960s....from middle working class white to black to pr to yuppies to yuppies with families to liberal opportunists.....those people will be paid a hefty sum to ...(more)
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 9, 2007

November 24, 2009 12:33 pm
ALBANY, N.Y. -- New York's top court ruled Tuesday that the state can use eminent domain to force homeowners and businesses to sell their properties for a massive development in Brooklyn that includes a new arena for the New Jersey Nets ...(more)
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 12, 2008

November 24, 2009 3:01 pm
This all sounds very much like the Supreme Court's ruling in Kelo v. City of New London.  Thoughts?
 
 
 
 
Headlines
 
CBS Sports Store