• My Scores
  • NCAA FB
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • Golf

NFL analyst Warren Sapp names names in Saints bounty scandal

By Ryan Wilson | CBSSports.com
Sapp went on NFL Network to name the 'snitch' responsible for sinking the Saints. (US PRESSWIRE)

The fallout from the Saints' bounty scandal continues. On Wednesday, commissioner Roger Goodell handed down punishments that made up in severity what they may have lacked in swiftness. The ruling comes more than two years after the incidents occurred during New Orleans' 2009 Super Bowl season, and nearly three weeks after the NFL released its initial findings.

Bountygate
On Wednesday afternoon, former NFL defensive lineman Warren Sapp, now an NFL analyst for NFL Network, went on said network to name names. Specifically: out the person responsible for clueing the NFL in on the Saints' bounty program.

“My source that was close to the situation informed me that [name omitted] is the one that was the snitch initially,” Sapp said via PFT.com. ”I trust my source unequivocally. … ”I did not call anybody at the league and I did not receive any information from the league. ...

“That's the information that I got and I trust my source.I was given that information, and I went with it, by a reliable source.”

So who, exactly, is [name omitted]? Turns out, Sapp outed them on Twitter before going on air.


Shockey didn't waste time responding:



Jeremy Shockey, who played for the Saints from 2008-2010 and was a part of the '09 championship team, denies the allegations.

But here's the thing: even if Shockey's telling the truth, Sapp's already put his name out there. It's the same reason political campaigns have been known to run ads that were patently false -- the facts don't matter. Instead, for some people, whatever they hear or read is what will stick with them.

But there's a bigger issue beyond who among Sapp, his source, and Shockey are telling the truth.

As PFT's Mike Florio points out: "NFL was able to dust off a cold case because someone blew the whistle during the 2011 season. And, as we explained earlier this month, it's critical that the NFL protect the whistleblower from any type of retaliation — including insults, threats, and/or specific acts of violence from an overly zealous fan who now thinks the Saints' Super Bowl title has been tainted and/or that the team's quest to play in the Super Bowl that will be hosted by New Orleans has now been derailed. As it turns out, the NFL has outed the suspected whistleblower. On the network that the NFL owns."

Ironcially, it was on the very same network earlier in the day that Goodell weighed in on the Saints' sanctions.

“Clearly, we were lied to,” he said. “We investigated this back in 2010, we were told it was not happening, it continued for another two years until we got credible evidence late in the 2011 season and we were able to identify significant information that verified from multiple sources that this was going on for a three-year period.”

"Credible evidence" may or may not include a former player with ties to the organization. But the next time the league investigates a scandal, it might be much tougher to find someone willing to offer a glimpse behind the curtain, especially when doing so comes with great personal and professional risks.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @EyeOnNFL on Twitter and subscribe to our NFL newsletter.
CBSSports Facebook Google Plus
COMMENTS
Conversation powered by Livefyre
NEVER MISS A MOCK DRAFT
Sign up to our newsletter and find out who your team could be picking
 

nfl Video

October 24, 2014
Chargers at Broncos booth recap (2:04)
1 October 23, 2014
Peyton Manning on big win over Chargers
(0:52)
2 October 23, 2014
Ask Bart Anything: Week 8
(2:23)
3 October 23, 2014
Thursday Night Football food debate: Chargers vs Broncos
(1:45)

Latest

Most Popular

CBSSports.com Shop

Mens Kansas City Royals vs. San Francisco Giants Majestic Black 2014 MLB World Series Dueling Sweep Victory Roster T-Shirt

Kansas City Royals vs. San Francisco Giants
Get the Gear
Shop Now