Colts owner Jim Irsay was in Atlanta this week at the NFL's league meetings trying to convince his fellow owners that Super Bowl LII should be awarded to Indianapolis. Irsay's plea didn't work -- the game was awarded to Minnesota -- but it did raise some questions.
Irsay was arrested in March and charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated. The Colts owner was also hit with four felony counts of possession of a controlled substance.
"Right now, if Jim Irsay is going to represent this league, represent the Indianapolis Colts, going to be on TV at the owners meetings, trying to bring a Super Bowl to Indianapolis after what he's done? It shows the hypocrisy of the NFL and also Roger Goodell in the way that he deals with players and the way he deals for the people he works for," Clark said on ESPN's "First Take."
"He's always said, 'Well, I don't work for the owners.' That's not true," Clark said "Because in the CBA negotiations, you were sitting with the owners."
Goodell explained this week that a possible Irsay punishment wouldn't be handed out "until we have more information, more facts, we will let it play out a little longer, yes."
Clark seemed to take issue with that statement because one of his former teammates, Ben Roethlisberger, was suspended for six games in 2010 despite the fact that he wasn't charged with a crime (Roethlisberger's punishment was later reduced to four games).
"So when has having enough information been what Roger Goodell waits for to make these decisions? When does a charge necessarily warrant the penalty? We've seen in so many cases, Roger Goodell be judge and jury when it comes to players," Clark said.
"So here we have Jim Irsay, a guy, an owner, who has history of substance abuse, who's found in a car with over $29K and prescription drugs that weren't in his name, pulled over for driving under the influence, and now we're saying we need more information? What more information do we need than these aren't your prescription pills?" Clark said. "You're obviously under the influence. You have $29k. There would be no questions asked if this was a player."
Goodell has a chance to set a precedent here, but it could end up being a precedent the players don't like.