powered by Google  
CBSSports.com Sorry, Colts/Saints fans ... Super Bowl highly unlikely - NFL Sports News   Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | MaxPreps | Mobile | Shop  
NFL Home | Scoreboard | Standings | Schedules | Stats | Teams | Players | Transactions | Injuries | Video | Fantasy News | NFL Today | Inside the NFL | NFL Draft | Super Bowl
 

Sorry, Colts/Saints fans ... Super Bowl highly unlikely

There are no better teams today than New Orleans and Indianapolis, so, naturally, the expectation is that they meet in the Super Bowl. Only I'm here to tell you they won't. One of them won't make it, and maybe neither gets that far.

Peyton Manning and the Colts know what it's like to start off fast but fade down the stretch. (Getty Images)  
Peyton Manning and the Colts know what it's like to start off fast but fade down the stretch. (Getty Images)  
That is not an opinion. It's a history lesson, and if you're skeptical, go back to this time last season when the best two teams were Tennessee and the New York Giants. The Titans were unbeaten. The Giants had lost once. Both were slam dunks to breeze through the playoffs, yet neither did. In fact, both bowed out after one game.

An aberration? Hardly. Teams that are white-hot at midseason often lose that momentum as the season winds down, and for good reason: It's difficult, if not near-impossible, to maintain a peak level of performance -- as well as to avoid key injuries -- for four months. The season is simply too long.

The 2007 New England team would seem to contradict that idea, only the way I see it they reinforced it. Yes, they won all 16 regular-season games, but look what happened down the stretch: They could have been beaten by Philadelphia. They should've lost to Baltimore. They should've lost to the New York Giants in the regular-season finale. And they were taken to the wire in the AFC Championship Game by a San Diego team operating without Antonio Gates and LaDainian Tomlinson and with quarterback Philip Rivers playing on one leg.

In short, they wound down as the stakes went up. So when they reached the Super Bowl they were beaten by a Giants team that, until a Dec. 23 defeat of Buffalo, wasn't sure it would qualify for the playoffs. The Giants weren't the best team in the NFC that season. Dallas was, but the Cowboys couldn't win a playoff game, either.

My point is this: Don't get dazzled by what's going on nine games into the season. Yeah, it's terrific that Indianapolis and New Orleans haven't lost, and, no, I don't see anyone out there that is superior. But I also know there are seven weeks left in the regular season, and that's a long, long time to maintain breakneck speed.

Besides, I'm not sure you want to maintain anything going into the playoffs. You want clubs that improve weekly. You look for teams that catch fire in the second half, start building momentum, gain confidence and take their game to the next level for the playoffs. San Diego GM A.J. Smith always says the key to any season is reaching the playoffs because anything is possible after that.

And he's right. Tennessee struggled down the stretch last season, splitting their last six games. The Giants floundered, losing three of their last four. So when the second season started it really didn't matter that both clubs held home-field advantages; what mattered was that their play ... and, probably, their confidence ... had declined.

That's why I urge you to start paying attention to teams that are beginning to build something -- someone, say, like Arizona or Cincinnati. They're good, they're dangerous and they're hot. So are Indianapolis and New Orleans. But how can they stay hot for five months? I mean, everyone is supposed to peak for the playoffs, right? But when you win early and keep winning, how do you suddenly peak when you've been doing it for four long and exhausting months? Often, teams don't, and the 2008 Titans are proof. So are the 2005 Indianapolis Colts. They won their first 13, then couldn't beat Pittsburgh in the playoffs. The 2003 Kansas City Chiefs will take their place in line behind them. They won their first nine, then couldn't beat Indianapolis in the playoffs.

"This is a game of confidence and momentum," said Carolina GM Marty Hurney, "whether it's teams or whether it's individual players. It's a game of confidence and momentum, and the teams that are hot at the end historically are the teams that do well in the playoffs."

Notice he didn't say the teams that are hot in September and October. That is not a knock on the Colts or Saints or anyone else who starts fast. New Orleans and Indianapolis are the best teams out there, and Indianapolis demonstrated why in last weekend's come-from-behind defeat of New England. The Colts and Saints produce points in bunches. Both play respectable defense. And both have shown the ability to rebound from large deficits.

By winning now, they can gain home-field advantage for the playoffs, and that is big. But it is not crucial. Only nine of the top 20 seeds in the past 10 years have made it to the Super Bowl, or 45 percent. Moreover, two of the last four Super Bowl winners were wild-card entries, clubs that made the playoffs by picking up their performances during the second half of the season.

One of my favorite examples is the 2005 Pittsburgh Steelers. After dropping to 7-5 with a loss to Cincinnati -- their third consecutive defeat -- they were supposed to be DOA. But they won their last three, then ran the table in the playoffs. Basically, they saved their best football for when it mattered most.

So there's a lesson there, and the lesson is this: While New Orleans and Indianapolis are good --- and I mean real good -- they may not be good enough to maintain their torrid paces. The last time the top two seeds entering the playoffs went to the Super Bowl it was 1993, and each had four losses. So there's a history of good teams going bad in the playoffs, and there's a history of top seeds going south. I like the Saints, and I like the Colts, and I like them a lot. But I like them now. One of them will not survive this grind, and it's not something I see in either club that tells me. It's something I see in the league's history.

 
 

Talk Back
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 19, 2008

November 18, 2009 10:51 pm
They've almost been losing for a few weeks.  And last week they barely beat the Rams.  An effort like that against NE won't cut it.  But, if they do beat NE I really don't know who else could beat them in the regular season.  I just know they need to play like they did earlier in the year.
Reputation:92
Level:All-Star
Since:Mar 22, 2008

November 18, 2009 11:29 pm
Wrong! Even though the Rams lost 3 games that season, two back to back losses were by 3 and 4 pts respectively, the last game of the season which had no significance was by 7. They kept that momentum and went on to win by s lim margin over the Titans in a hard fought Super Bowl. I'm ...(more)
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 24, 2006

November 19, 2009 1:24 pm
.. or better make the SB about 50% of the time? I may be wrong but I thought I heard that and if it's true, I'll take those odds.
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 22, 2006

November 20, 2009 12:35 am
All these teams in the playoffs is predictable...to say the Saints and Colts aren't going to the Super Bowl would be a mistake...The Saints remind me of the Rams a few years back...Great offense and a defense that would bend , ...(more)
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Oct 27, 2009

November 19, 2009 10:05 am
First of all, I agree with all the other criticisms of this lame idea that a winning team is doomed. As a Saints fan, I am tired of hearing that the Saints are just like last year's Titans. They are nothing at all like the Titans (just start with the quarterback and go down a long lis ...(more)
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 17, 2007

November 18, 2009 9:11 pm
Every year, around this time of the season, on sports websites throughout the internet, some version of this column pops up--the teams that are hot early don't finish hot. They're all well-reasoned, they're all filled with plenty of historical evidence to make the very accurate point, indeed, most teams that lead the pack midway through the season don't finish in the Superbowl, much less win it. I ...(more)
Reputation:89
Level:All-Star
Since:Jan 6, 2007

November 20, 2009 12:34 am
Judge,

Either you have a terrible memory, or you are intentionally ignoring an obvious team that just won the Super Bowl not too long ago.  The '06 Colts started the season 9-0 (just like this year's Colts), and they ended up losing 4 of their last 7 games.  They entered the playoffs as one of the least momentum-fille
...(more)
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Feb 2, 2008

November 18, 2009 1:36 pm
Sure those teams you mentioned that went to the playoffs last year choked, but that is last year. The Saints have a long history of being a bad team who loses big games, but this is 2009. Who cares what happened last year, the year before, etc? There's always a possibility of something new happening and bucking a trend.

Earlier th
...(more)
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Dec 24, 2006

November 18, 2009 10:47 pm

I agree that teams can't play at a SuperBowl level for 16 weeks.  And it is showing in the Saints.  Yes, they were scorching hot in the first 5 games this season winning all of them by double-digits.  But since that time, they have slowed considerably.  In week 6 they survive 4 TO's and win -- again by double digits-- ...(more)

Reputation:91
Level:All-Star
Since:Jul 28, 2008

November 18, 2009 10:36 pm
This makes no sense to me.  According to this article, the Colts and Saints would be better served to lose their next three games.  However, I guarentee that if they did, Prisco and Judge would be saying that they'd lost their momentum and we now had to look at them to see i ...(more)
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 18, 2008

November 18, 2009 10:52 pm
Yes there is evidence to prove your point Judge, but no team is going to intentionally lose a game before the playoffs start. I can understand those who will say the  Indianapolis Colts have done this before, but the New Orleans Saints haven't. As the year goes on games do get to ...(more)
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 14, 2006

November 19, 2009 12:06 am
Seriously Clark isnt there anything better to write about right this minute?  I dont know about Saints fans but I can tell you that anyone who has been a Colts fan longer than a day never takes the regular season seriously.  Near perfect records and home field advantage are ...(more)
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 6, 2006

November 18, 2009 10:50 pm
It seems like the era when teams seemed on a collision course for the postseason has indeed long left us.

Consider that the Colts lost in the playoffs last year to a team that had been 4-8.  And that the NFC representative was going to be a 9 win team regardless of who won.

15-1 Pittsburgh and Minnesota don't even
...(more)
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Jul 22, 2007

November 19, 2009 12:08 pm
The Saints and the Colts should simply be assigned to the Super Bowl and let them have the entire month of January off before playing.  The other 10 teams chosen for the playoffs should simply play exhibition games against each other while we wait for the big Saints-Colts showdow ...(more)
Reputation:85
Level:All-Star
Since:Oct 26, 2009

November 20, 2009 11:26 am
So far this year, Clark Judge is running at a 52% on his predictions... I don't know about you but im not going to listen to somebody who doesn't know what they are talking about.  Did he just flip a coin and whatever way the coin lands is the way he write the article...C'mon Man!  Now, i dont expect both the New Orleans Saints and ...(more)
 
 
 
 
Clark Judge
Recent Columns
 
Headlines
 
 
 
CBS Sports Store
Reebok New Orleans Saints Super Bowl XLIV Champions Locker Room T-Shirt
New Orleans Saints XLIV Super Bowl Champs
Get your Gear Shop Now