• My Scores
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • Golf
  • Tennis

Super Bowl 50

Sun, Feb 7, 2016

Get the latest Super Bowl news >>

Super Bowl Commercials
Broncos Win Super Bowl 50
Home of Super Bowl 50
Watch Now 16 Things to Know Full Coverage
Senior NFL Columnist

Colts trade for Trent Richardson is a bold, but bad, move

Colts general manager Ryan Grigson is giving up a 2014 first-round pick for Trent Richardson.  (USATSI)
Colts general manager Ryan Grigson is giving up a 2014 first-round pick for Trent Richardson. (USATSI)

I have great respect for Indianapolis Colts general manager Ryan Grigson. He isn't one to back down from his beliefs and he's more than willing to tell you when he doesn't agree with something you wrote. I like that.

So now I am giving it back to him: I hate the trade for Browns running back Trent Richardson.

The Colts are giving up a 2014 first-round pick to trade for a back who has had some injury history in a league where backs have been greatly devalued. I know they lost Vick Ballard, and Ahmad Bradshaw isn't the long-term answer, but Richardson hasn't shown to be worth it either. His 17-game per-carry average is 3.5.

So far this season he has 105 yards on 31 carries, for a whopping 3.1 average. The Cleveland line hasn't been good, and the passing game is ordinary at best, but this was supposed to be a top-tier back. That hasn't been the case.

I watched the Browns-Ravens tape Tuesday because I wanted to see what was wrong with the offense and to see how the Ravens bounced back from that debacle at Denver. I watched all of Richardson's runs. What I saw were several plays where he took a pitch or a handoff and was dumped for a loss with a man immediately in his face. His best runs came on quick tosses to get him outside.

Richardson's runs inside were less than impressive. There were a handful of times where he had cutback lanes and he picked the wrong one or kept going to the play side for a small gain. I was unimpressed.

When the Browns drafted him in 2012, I wrote then it was a mistake, not because he lacked talent but because he's a running back and they don't decide titles anymore. They are complementary pieces.

The Colts are trying to build their running game up, so I understand the move from their point of view. Chuck Pagano and offensive coordinator Pep Hamilton are big proponents of the running game. Hamilton told me at camp how he planned to run it more this season, his first with the team. Hopefully not too much, I told him, this is Andrew Luck's team. But the Colts coaches thought Luck took way too many shots last season because they didn't run it well enough and he's taken his fair share so far in 2013.

Is Richardson the guy to change that? Not if the offensive line doesn't play better. How much better is Richardson than a healthy Bradshaw? Better for sure, but not nearly enough for my liking.

I get that Richardson is 22. I see the ability and the amazing stuff he did in college. But I don't see the value. Not in this league. Not the way the game is played. Runners don't decide it anymore.

So I am saying it now: I hate this trade for the Colts.

Six months from now, I am sure Grigson will let me know how wrong I am if Richardson is what the Colts think he can become. But I have my doubts.

Pete Prisco has covered the NFL for three decades, including working as a beat reporter in Jacksonville for the Jaguars. He hosted his own radio show for seven years, and is the self-anointed star of CBS Sports' show, Eye on Football. When he's not watching game tape, you can find Pete on Twitter or dreaming of an Arizona State national title in football.
CBSSports Facebook Google Plus
Conversation powered by Livefyre
Sign up to our newsletter and find out who your team could be picking

nfl Video

February 8, 2016
February 8, 2016
1ST QUARTER: Will Peyton Manning retire?
February 8, 2016
2ND QUARTER: Defense wins champions
February 8, 2016
3RD QUARTER: What did we learn about Cam Newton?


Most Popular

2016 Super Bowl
Super Bowl