Chris Johnson's turf/grass splits are getting wider
Injury concerns aside, Chris Johnson should sign with a team that plays on turf. He's averaged 4.74 yards per carry on turf the past three seasons, 3.97 on grass.
|Chris Johnson has fared much better on turf than grass the past three years. (USATSI)|
Chris Johnson has played all his home games on natural grass. Amid speculation he might sign with the Jets or Falcons -- who play on synthetic turf -- it's worth looking at how Johnson fares on turf versus grass.
Backs like Johnson, conventional wisdom goes, are even faster on turf.
Johnson's split isn't dramatic over his career. He's averaged 4.67 yards per carry on turf (381 carries), 4.54 on grass (1,361 carries).
But over the past three years, the gap has grown wide: 4.74 ypc on turf, 3.97 ypc on grass. That bodes well for Johnson if he plays home games at MetLife Stadium or the Georgia Dome, even if he's not breaking as many tackles as he used to.
Charles has averaged 6.25 yards per carry on turf (155 carries), 5.46 on grass (888 carries).
Bush has played home games on both surfaces. He's averaged 4.51 ypc on turf (664 carries) and 4.13 on grass (526 carries).
While Johnson's career split isn't as wide, it's been huge the past three years. Last season it was his biggest ever: 4.8 ypc on turf, 3.7 on grass.
Johnson's touchdown rate also is better on turf. In his six-year career, Johnson has scored a rushing touchdown every 27.2 carries on turf, every 37.8 carries on grass.
Johnson has a better chance of performing like an RB2 if he goes to a team that plays on turf.
Jamey Eisenberg gives you the winners and losers from the championship round, with an eye on...
Playing in a playoff challenge for Fantasy? We've got the latest on injuries to help you o...
Mike McClure has won over $1M playing Fantasy football and gives his optimal Championship Sunday...
Jamey Eisenberg gives you lineup suggestions on FanDuel and DraftKings for players in the AFC...
Still waiting for that grand tight end breakout that's been predicted in each of the last 10...
While running backs thrived in 2017, wide receivers disappointed. Here's a glance at why wideouts...