Cubs deny grounds crew short-staffed because of effort to avoid Obamacare
You'll recall the recent tarp debacle at Wrigley Field. The Cubs are denying a report that the grounds crew was unprepared because the team was trying to avoid paying out full-time benefits.
You'll recall that on Wednesday night, the Giants-Cubs game was cut short because the Wrigley Field grounds crew was unable to secure the tarp in advance of a downpour. Here's how that went ...
As for why the Cubs' grounds crew was unable to perform one of their most basic tasks, here's Gordon Wittenmyer of the Chicago Sun-Times:
The staffing issues that hamstrung the grounds crew Tuesday during a mad dash with the tarp under a sudden rainstorm were created in part by a wide-ranging reorganization last winter of game-day personnel, job descriptions and work limits designed to keep the seasonal workers – including much of the grounds crew – under 130 hours per month, according to numerous sources with direct knowledge.
That’s the full-time worker definition under “Obamacare,” which requires employer-provided healthcare benefits for “big businesses” such as a major league team.
Speaking to the industry standard for grounds crew staffing, all three officials said the video of Tuesday’s incident showed an apparently “undermanned” crew (of 15 pulling the tarp on the night’s first unsuccessful try).
As for the Cubs, they're firmly denying that "Obamacare" had anything to do with the state of the grounds crew on Wednesday night. Here's what Cubs spokesman Julian Green told ESPN Chicago on Friday:
"The budget for grounds crew and maintenance has not been slashed. It is true there have been organizational changes to ensure the business operation is running efficiently. That's something every organization does whether you are in sports or corporate America.
"We are not going to make any personnel decisions at the expense of making sure that field is ready for play because that impacts the game itself and it impacts the fan experience."
I have not the slightest interest in holding forth on the Affordable Care Act in this forum, but if the Cubs were indeed making staffing cuts to the grounds crew, that's roundly ill-advised. If you need to trim the budget, you do it elsewhere. You don't winnow down the grounds crew when you call home a 100-year-old open-air ballpark in Chicago. Of course, the Cubs deny the grounds crew budget has been reduced, and since they're a privately held entity, there's no way to countervail those claims.
The Red Sox and Cardinals are expected to make trade offers next
The free agent first baseman may be a fit in St. Louis
The front office changes in Atlanta continue
The Marlins are more likely than you think on our list
Judge finished a distant second in the balloting and he paid respect to the winner
Stanton just won the 2017 NL MVP award but could wind up being dealt this offseason