Giancarlo Stanton's opt-out may not be bad news for Marlins

As reported by our own Jon Heyman, the Marlins on Wednesday will announce that they've signed slugger Giancarlo Stanton to a mammoth contract -- at $325 million over 13 years, the largest contract in MLB history. Heyman also reports that the deal will include an opt-out that will allow Stanton to become a free agent not long after his 30th birthday (he turned 25 earlier this month).

At first blush, this would seem to be a troublesome wrinkle from the Marlins' standpoint. They'll pay dearly to lock up Stanton until his late 30s, but then Stanton can simply tear up the contract if he decides he can do better on the market. However, if Stanton winds up opting out, it won't be bad news for the Marlins -- at all.

Let's say, given the implications above, Stanton's deal allows him to opt out after the 2019 season, at which point he'll have, as Heyman notes, just turned 30. If Stanton exercises that right, then that will mean he's maintained a high level of performance -- high enough, in fact, to persuade him and his representatives that he can make more on the market than the final eight years of his Marlins contract guarantee him. This will mean that Stanton will have provided tremendous value over the first five years of the deal, otherwise he'd never dare test the market.

Therein lies the value for the Marlins. These kinds of mega-contracts are almost always backloaded, so that the player is underpaid relative to the market at the front end and overpaid at the back end. It's to the team's advantage to free up cash in the short term, and players, given that multiyear contracts in MLB are guaranteed, don't worry so much about putting off higher paydays for a few years. No obligations to Stanton after Year 5 means that the Marlins will likely escape the post-prime portion of the contract, when the player tends not to live up to his yearly salary. That's a good thing for the team.

To be sure, the Marlins must take advantage of those five years by surrounding Stanton with contending-caliber talents. They'll also need to avoid the pitfall of re-signing the opted-out player, which is something that almost never works out for the team (see: A-Rod's and CC Sabathia's post-opt-out contracts with the Yankees for a couple of cautionary examples). All you're doing at that point is paying a premium for the player's deep decline phase. Stanton's a generational player, but you might not want to commit to him too far into his 30s. 

Really, an exercised opt-out likely means that the team has gotten exceptional value over those initial years of the contract. It's a problem when the player doesn't opt out (meaning he believes his remaining contract exceeds his market value) or if the team, out of a misplaced sense of something, re-signs the aging player at new, costlier terms. 

So if Stanton opts out after the 2019 season, then the Marlins should pat themselves on the back and or coin-purse for having extracted so much value from Stanton in his age-25 through age-30 seasons. And then they should bid him farewell. 

Would it really be so bad for the Marlins if Giancarlo Stanton opted out of his big contract? (USATSI)
Would it really be so bad for the Marlins if Giancarlo Stanton opted out of his big contract? (USATSI)
CBS Sports Writer

Dayn Perry has been a baseball writer for CBS Sports since early 2012. Prior to that, he wrote for FOXSports.com and ESPN.com. He's the author of three books, the most recent being Reggie Jackson: The... Full Bio

Our Latest Stories