PHOTO: The 'Cardinals' Way' vs. the 'Dodgers' Pay'
Is the NLCS a story of good (largely homegrown) against evil (built by buying other teams' talent)? To hear one paper tell it, yes.
The 2013 Cardinals were largely forged through amateur signing and development. This year's Dodgers model, in contrast, was primarily built around free agent acquisitions and through salary-absorbing trades (note: the words "largely" and "primarily" are not absolute). In a vacuum, it scarcely matters -- winning is the point, and the champagne cares not how you earned the right to spray it. In terms of broader appeal outside the two fan bases in question, though, there's no doubt that the methodical construction of the Cardinals is more appealing than the "throw money at the problem" approach of the Dodgers (note: throwing money at a problem sometimes works quite well).
In any event, the hometown St. Louis Post-Dispatch certainly drew such distinctions with their art for an NLCS insert in Friday's edition. Regard:
Please do use the comments section to argue over which team is morally superior!
Sheffield has the numbers to make it to Cooperstown, but he has received very little suppo...
Granderson heads north of the border for his age-37 season
What did the Pirates get in return for their franchise player?
Rivero could remain in Pittsburgh for some time to come
The White Sox, Angels, Athletics, Orioles and Marlins are the holdouts after Blue Jays fol...
The Pirates have several attractive trade chips if they decide to go into a full rebuild