Richard Sherman on NFL's confusing new targeting rule: 'It's going to be a disaster'
Sherman's views are shared by many players who are seeking clarity on the new helmet rule
Earlier this week, Eagles players were "frustrated" after meeting with NFL referees to get some clarity on what amounts to a version of college football's targeting rule, one that also includes ejections.
"We were trying to ask questions to get a better understanding, and yet they couldn't really give us an answer," Eagles linebacker Nigel Bradham said. "They couldn't give us what we were looking for."
That's not good.
"It's ridiculous," Sherman told USAToday.com's Jarrett Bell. "They'll see how ridiculous it is, once they make the refs call it. It's going to be worse than holding, worse than the catch rule. On a good form tackle, guys will lead with their shoulder pads, but you bring your head. It's going to be a disaster."
"They want us to, I guess, hit with our shoulder," he said, via ESPN.com. "I guess not hit a guy when he ducks. So I guess we just gotta aim for the knees. That's the only way I know how. If you don't want me to hit you, then I guess it's the only way, the only way."
If this sounds familiar, it should; four years ago, Swearinger, then with the Texans, was involved in a controversial-but-legal low tackle during a preseason game against the Jets. Tight end Dustin Keller suffered a serious knee injury on a hit that ended his career.
"With the rules in this era you've got to hit low," Swearinger said at the time. "If I would have hit him high, I would have gotten a fine. So I think I made the smartest play. I'm sorry it happened and I pray he has a speedy recovery. ... Right now it's just instinct. You see somebody come across the middle, you gotta go low. You're going to cost your team 15 yards. You've got to play within the rules."
At the time, the NFL was trying to reduce head injuries by making above-the-shoulder hits a personal-foul penalty. The new targeting rule adds another layer of punishment, in the form of an ejection -- and, it looks like, confusion. Which brings us back to the Eagles' recent meeting with referees.
According to ESPN.com's Tim McManus, players showed a clip of safety Malcolm Jenkins' hit on wide receiver Brandin Cooks during Super Bowl LII that knocked Cooks out of the game. At the time, it was a legal play. When asked if that constituted a violation under the new rules, the referees were split on whether they would have thrown a flag.
"[The refs] were kind of like, 'Hey, we didn't make the rules.' Because I think guys were kind of frustrated," Eagles running back Wendell Smallwood said. "Most of the defense was like, 'Man, how are we supposed to tackle?' They were frustrated."
Unless there's further clarification in the coming weeks, things will get worse before they get better. Silver lining: Hey, at least we're not talking about the anthem issues.
Pick Six Newsletter
Get the day's big stories + fun stuff you love like mock drafts, picks and power rankings.
Thanks for signing up!
Keep an eye on your inbox for the latest sports news.
There was an error processing your subscription.
Here's your first look at the injuries we're tracking for Week 3 in the NFL
Yes, the Browns Color Rush uniforms do exist, and yes, they're actually going to wear them...
The Bills corner has an explanation for his bizarre situation
SportsLine computer model simulated every Week 3 NFL game 10,000 times with surprising res...
The Ravens have now paid more than $700,000 in fines over the past two years
The Packers quarterback could be dealing with his knee injury for the next few weeks