Giants reportedly get creative to sign Tony Watson, avoid luxury tax penalties
Watson will give the Giants a good left-handed reliever
The San Francisco Giants have been one of the winter's most active teams, trying as best as they can to atone for last season's 64-98 record that left them tied with the Detroit Tigers for baseball's worst mark.
The Giants have also been creative this offseason, a characteristic evident in their latest deal: reportedly a two-year pact with left-handed reliever Tony Watson.
Watson, 33 in May, is coming off an uneven effort. Previously a reliable late-inning reliever for the Pittsburgh Pirates, he saw his strikeout and home-run rates head in the wrong direction during the first half of the season. His velocity was also down.
Watson regained the oomph on his heater during the year, however, and was much improved following a midseason deal to the Los Angeles Dodgers, with whom he recorded 15 more strikeouts than unintentional walks in 20 innings. It's worth noting that Watson's move out west included an increased preference for his sinker over his four-seam fastball. At minimum, he'll give the Giants a good left-on-left option.
With apologies to Watson, the most interesting aspect of this agreement is how it's structured to keep the Giants below the competitive balance tax. The Giants entered negotiations with just over $2 million separating them from the $197 million tax threshold. How exactly did they land Watson, who made nearly $6 million in 2017, without exceeding that mark? With creative structuring and presentation:
Jackson signed a two-year deal worth $6 million guaranteed. Yet his deal included escalators and performance incentives that could increase his 2019 salary without impacting his 2018 pay. Jackson could earn an additional $1 million in 2019 if he accumulates 375 plate appearances in 2018, and could add another $1.5 million on top of that in 2019 pay if he's able to reach 475 plate appearances that season. Watson's deal will presumably include incentives and escalators for his appearances or innings pitched totals that won't kick in until 2019 or 2020.
The Giants have walked a thin line this winter in order to add talent while remaining under the luxury tax threshold. The trades that saw them acquire Evan Longoria and Andrew McCutchen also saw them receive cash to offset the aging stars' salaries -- and that's without factoring in Denard Span's inclusion in the Longoria trade, as Span will count for more than $13 million in tax purposes, per Cot's Contracts. The careful accounting has left the Giants with little breathing room, but a little breathing room is better than no breathing room.
Why are the Giants going through all this trouble? To reset their luxury-tax penalty rate. The Giants have paid more than $8 million in overage fees over the last three seasons, and would be penalized at a 50 percent rate if they go back over this season. Presumably the Giants are positioning themselves to go back over the threshold (which will increase to $206 million in 2019) this upcoming winter, when Bryce Harper, Manny Machado, and others hit the market.
CBS Sports HQ Daily Newsletter
Get the best highlights and stories - yeah, just the good stuff handpicked by our team to start your day.
Thanks for signing up!
Keep an eye on your inbox for the latest sports news.
There was an error processing your subscription.
Plus, the NL Central keeps winning, the Astros magic number is three and more
Keep checking back for the latest rumors, firings and hires around the MLB managerial caro...
"Hawk" had been doing White Sox games for 35 years and is now retired
If Gregorius is unavailable, the Yankees would likely turn to Adeiny Hechavarria or Neil W...
Will Craig Counsell go with Gio Gonzalez, Zach Davies, or his bullpen?
Everyone but Paul Goldschmidt has stopped hitting