Greg Norman says he 'probably' would have beaten Tiger Woods
Tiger Woods is such an object of fascination, both for golfers and golf fans alike.
Norman got to talking about winning and what it's all about and unleashed this gem"
"A lot of people ask how I'd stack up against today's players if I had use of modern equipment. Listen, it's not about the gear. Winning is about what's in your heart and in your head. Equipment dictates how to play the game in an era, but the physical and mental skills are the same. And I had them. I never feared anything or anyone on the course, and I wasn't afraid to fail. So I think I'd do pretty well against Snead, Hogan, Tiger and Phil -- whoever. Tiger's a tough guy, but I was a tough guy on the course, too. I probably would have beat him."
Well, ok, a lot of people beat Tiger Woods. Victor Dubuisson just beat Tiger Woods in a tournament in Turkey. Zach Johnson beat him in California. He's been beat at tournaments by thousands of golfers over the course of his career.
I guess I don't really understand what Norman is saying. Does he think he would have taken Woods down at the majors? Does he think he would be better than Woods if he played today?
The entire article is actually really good but this quote is quite silly, especially without context.
We get a second round reset as Kyle Stanley leads the charge at East Lake
Kyle Stanley is your leader after a busy first round at East Lake
Find out when and how to watch the 2017 Tour Championship live this week
What if the No. 1 guy in the FedEx Cup standings is watching a putt for $10 million on Sun...
Belichick is talking about driving and putting again
The final 30 are set for East Lake on Thursday as the hunt for $10 million begins